Distributional Preferences and Political Behavior , with Ray
نویسنده
چکیده
We document the relationship between distributional preferences and voting decisions in a large and diverse sample of Americans. Using a generalized dictator game, we generate individual-level measures of fair-mindedness (weight on oneself versus others) and equality-efficiency tradeoffs. Subjects' equality-efficiency tradeoffs predict their political decisions: equality-focused subjects are more likely to have voted for Barack Obama in 2012, and to be affiliated with the Democratic Party. Our findings shed light on how American voters are motivated by their distributional preferences.
منابع مشابه
Distributional Preferences and Political Behavior∗
We decompose distributional preferences into fair-mindedness (weight on oneself vs. others) and equality-efficiency tradeoffs, and measure both at the individual level in a large and diverse sample of Americans. We find considerable heterogeneity in both the extent of fairmindedness and willingness to trade off equality and efficiency, much of which cannot be explained by standard socioeconomic...
متن کاملThe Distributional Preferences of Americans∗
This paper characterize the distributional preferences of a large and diverse sample of Americans. We decompose distributional preferences into two distinct components — fair-mindedness (tradeoffs between oneself and others) and equality-efficiency tradeoffs — by estimating constant elasticity of substitution utility functions at the individual level. We find considerable heterogeneity in both ...
متن کاملInequality Perceptions, Distributional Norms, and Redistributive Preferences in East and West Germany
This paper studies differences in inequality perceptions, distributional norms, and redistributive preferences between East and West Germany. As expected, there are substantial differences with respect to all three of these measures. Surprisingly, however, differences in distributional norms are much smaller than differences with respect to inequality perceptions or redistributive preferences. ...
متن کاملTesting theories of fairness - Intentions matter
Recently developed models of fairness can explain a wide variety of seemingly contradictory facts. One of the most controversial and yet unresolved issues in the modeling of fairness preferences concerns the behavioral relevance of fairness intentions. Intuitively, fairness intentions seem to play an important role in economic relations, political struggles, and legal disputes but there is surp...
متن کاملTesting Theories of Fairness - Intentions Matter Armin Falk , Ernst Fehr and Urs Fischbacher September 2000
Recently developed models of fairness can explain a wide variety of seemingly contradictory facts. The most controversial and yet unresolved issue in the modeling of fairness preferences concerns the behavioral relevance of fairness intentions. Intuitively, fairness intentions seem to play an important role in economic relations, political struggles and legal disputes. Yet, so far there is litt...
متن کامل